Is It Cheaper to Hire Event Staff Through a Temp Agency?

Published: May 2026 | Last updated: May 2026 | Written by Michal Orlowski, Co-Founder, Cube

---

About the author: Michael is the co-founder of Cube, a London hospitality staffing agency established in 2009. Having run his own agency before co-founding Cube with Michal Orlowski, Michael has spent over fifteen years overseeing the operations and day to day running of one of London's most trusted hospitality staffing businesses. He has placed staff at events ranging from intimate private dinners to large-scale corporate galas at venues including The Dorchester, Sofitel and Ham Yard Hotel.

About Cube: Cube is a London hospitality staffing agency supplying vetted waiters, bar staff, chefs, hostesses and kitchen staff for events, hotels, venues and catering companies across Greater London. Established 2009. 99% fulfilment rate. 24-hour human support available by phone, text or email. cubestaff.co.uk

---

It is one of the most common questions we hear. And on the surface it seems like a straightforward numbers exercise. Compare the agency rate against what you would pay someone directly and pick the cheaper one.

The problem is that is not how the maths actually works.

After over a decade supplying hospitality staff to London's best caterers, hotels and venues, I have watched countless clients go through this thought process. Some go with the cheaper option. Some try to build their own team. Some come back to us. This post is the honest conversation I have with all of them.

The Short Answer

Using a reputable agency costs more per hour on paper. It costs less overall when you factor in recruitment time, employment overhead, no-show risk and the very real reputational cost of a bad event. The question is not whether an agency is cheaper. It is what a bad event actually costs you.

The Costs Nobody Puts in the Spreadsheet

When people ask whether an agency is cheaper, they almost always forget to account for the cost of not using one.

Think about what hiring direct actually involves. You need to advertise the role, which costs time and often money. You need to sift through applications, decide who to contact, arrange interviews, conduct them and then make offers. And after all of that, you still have to deal with no-shows, cancellations and last-minute gaps yourself.

None of that time is free. If you are a catering manager, an events coordinator or a venue operator, every hour you spend on recruitment is an hour you are not spending on your actual job. That cost is invisible on a spreadsheet but it is very real.

An agency absorbs all of it. The advertising, the vetting, the interviews, the chasing, the replacing. It is all handled before you even know there was a problem.

What Is Actually Inside an Agency Rate

When a client looks at an agency hourly rate and compares it to a direct worker wage, they are comparing two very different things.

What you see on an agency invoice is a single number. What that number actually covers includes the worker's holiday pay, employer's national insurance contributions, pension costs, recruitment and onboarding expenses and the cost of running the platform and maintaining the staff pool.

It also covers something you cannot easily put a price on. The cost of filling last-minute cancellations. When a member of staff drops out the evening before your event, we cover a bonus to incentivise someone else to step in at short notice. That cost does not appear on your invoice. Neither does the effort of making it happen at midnight. That stays with us, not with you.

When you hire direct, all of that lands on your desk.

Why the Cheaper Agency Usually Is Not

When a client tells me they have found an agency with a lower rate, there are really only two explanations.

The first is that the agency is taking a smaller margin. That means they have to work twice as hard to make the same return and that pressure shows in the quality of their service and support.

The second, and more common, is that they are paying their staff less. And that matters enormously because pay directly affects the quality of the person who turns up to your event. Better pay attracts better people. It really is that straightforward. An agency that undercuts on rate is, in most cases, undercutting on the people too.

We have held firm on our rates for years even when it has cost us clients in the short term. In my experience those clients tend to come back. Not always immediately, but once the quality gap becomes impossible to ignore the conversation changes. The question stops being "why are you more expensive?" and becomes "can you help us fix this?"

The In-House Team Question

Some businesses decide the answer is to build their own casual team rather than rely on an agency at all. It is a reasonable instinct and in the right circumstances it can work.

If you have a steady, predictable flow of events and enough shifts to keep the same people engaged week after week, an in-house team gives you familiarity and consistency. The staff know how you work. There is real value in that.

But the model has a ceiling. The moment you have a sudden spike in demand, a large one-off event, a busy December or an unexpected booking, you are exposed. You either cannot cover it or you end up scrambling in exactly the same way you would have without an agency.

You also need to factor in the hidden overhead of managing your own casual pool. Someone's time is being spent on scheduling, replacing no-shows and handling admin. In a larger operation that becomes a staffing manager role. That is a significant cost that rarely appears in the initial calculation.

Using an agency regularly can give you many of the same benefits as an in-house team, familiar faces and people who understand your standards, while also covering you when volume spikes or emergencies hit.

No-Shows: The Real Cost

The impact of a no-show depends entirely on scale.

At a large event with 80 or 100 staff, one absence is manageable. The team absorbs it and the event carries on. But when you are running a small private dinner with two members of staff and one does not arrive, the consequences are immediate and serious. Service deteriorates. Guests notice. And the reputation that takes years to build can take a single bad evening to damage.

When you are managing your own team, that problem is yours to solve. Usually at the worst possible moment, when you are already at the venue and the guests are arriving. When you use a proper agency, the replacement process starts the moment we are told, from a pool of available staff you simply do not have access to on your own.

Volume, Negotiation and Getting Better Value

Here is something that surprises some clients. Using an agency for larger bookings can actually bring your unit cost down.

If you are running your own team, the cost per person stays fixed regardless of the size of the event. You pay the same rate whether you need two people or twenty. With an agency, larger bookings open the door to a conversation about volume. A good agency will want to keep your business and will work with you on rate for significant bookings without reducing the quality of the staff they provide.

The key to this is relationship. Clients who work with us regularly, who we know and trust, are the ones we go further for when they have a tight budget or a big ask. If you have built that rapport over time and then come to us with a one-off event where the numbers are genuinely stretched, the honest conversation is simple. Tell us and we will see what we can do.

If Your Budget Is Tight: What to Actually Do

We are not going to pretend every client has unlimited budget. They do not and we work with that reality every day.

If cost is a genuine constraint, the advice is straightforward. Build a relationship with an agency first, then have the honest conversation when you need flexibility. Do not start from price. Start from quality, build trust and then when a specific event demands it, ask what can be done.

What you should not do is default to the cheapest option from the beginning and hope for the best. Because the cost of a bad event, in client relationships, in reputation and in the very real possibility of having to fix it at the last minute, will almost always exceed whatever you saved on the staffing invoice.

The Honest Summary

There is a question behind the question "is it cheaper to use a temp agency?" and it is really this: what does a bad event actually cost me?

When you factor in recruitment time, hidden employment costs, no-show risk, last-minute chaos and the reputational impact of staff who are not right for the room, the agency rate starts to look very different.

Paying a higher rate means the agency can offer better pay to their staff. Better pay attracts better people to your event. That is not a sales pitch. That is just how it works.

Quick Reference: The True Cost Comparison

Hiring direct: Advertising costs to find staff in the first place. Time spent interviewing and vetting every candidate. Holiday pay, national insurance and pension to manage yourself. No backup when someone cancels on the day. No pool to draw from during busy or peak periods. Admin overhead that eventually becomes a staffing manager salary.

Using a reputable agency: A single hourly rate that covers all of the above. Last-minute replacements handled for you from a vetted pool. Access to a large pool of experienced, assessed professionals. Volume discounts available for larger or regular bookings.

Get a Quote

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it cheaper to hire event staff directly rather than through an agency? On paper the direct hire rate looks lower. In practice it rarely is once you factor in advertising costs, time spent vetting and interviewing, employment overhead including holiday pay and national insurance, and the cost of managing your own no-shows and last-minute gaps. An agency absorbs all of those costs within its hourly rate.

What is included in an event staffing agency rate? A reputable agency rate covers the worker's wages, holiday pay, employer national insurance contributions, pension costs, recruitment and vetting expenses and the operational cost of replacing staff at short notice when something goes wrong. You pay one number. The agency manages everything behind it.

Why do some event staffing agencies charge less than others? Agencies with lower rates are either taking a smaller margin, which affects their service quality, or paying their staff less. Lower staff pay attracts a lower quality of candidate. The rate difference between a reliable agency and a cheap one is usually small. The performance difference on the night is often significant.

Can I negotiate rates with an event staffing agency? Yes, particularly for larger or regular bookings. Volume creates the basis for a rate conversation with any reputable agency. The best time to have that conversation is after you have built a relationship, not before you have placed your first booking.

What happens when a directly hired event worker does not show up? The problem is entirely yours to manage, usually at the worst possible moment. With an agency, the replacement process starts immediately from their vetted staff pool. Cube finds replacements within 90 minutes in the majority of cases.

Is building an in-house casual team better than using a staffing agency? For operations with a steady, predictable event schedule an in-house casual team offers familiarity and consistency. The limitation is coverage during demand spikes, busy seasonal periods and unexpected bookings. Most operations find a combination of a regular in-house team and an agency relationship for overflow and emergencies is the most cost-effective model.